Author Archive: roman

Australia votes against division

In this federal election, Australians were offered a clear choice between competent governance and social inclusion or divisive politics.
They decisively chose the former.

While this election was ostensibly focused on cost of living pressures, it was, in many ways, about the very spirit of the country. Trump-influenced right-wing populism was hardwired into the Coalition’s platform. Leader Peter Dutton lifted tactics directly from the Trump playbook. Apart from driving division over things like Welcome to Country, the Coalition’s energy agenda was deeply regressive, focused on promoting nuclear power, coal and gas, and opposition to the renewable energy transition.

Prime Minister Albanese now has a clear mandate to get on with the job with the shift to renewable energy. This is not a piecemeal task – it is a huge opportunity that needs more ambition.

 

Even far-right Liberal MP James Patterson admitted on election night that “the Trump factor” was significant in the outcome.

As with Canada’s recent elections, the Australian people have resoundingly rejected right-wing populism.

Grievance politics has become the default setting for conservative political parties. It started with Pauline Hanson’s party in the 1990s and has become mainstream in both the Liberal and National parties. The result of the 2025 election demonstrated clearly the limits of this approach. The community voted en masse against the politics of division.

As independent Zali Steggall said on the night, ‘people want to see issues like climate change addressed’.

Friends of the Earth has been leading the way in cultivating community-led solutions to the climate crisis. From our Yes 2 Renewables and No New Gas campaign to Tipping Point and Healthy Futures, which is mobilising the community in support of the energy transition and against fossil fuels, we are well placed to ramp up our influence and ensure a rapid transition to renewables, storage, and energy efficiency and an end to fossil fuel production.

Our anti nuclear campaign – FoE’s longest running campaign – has achieved a significant win in terms of shifting the public debate away from this dangerous technology. With pro-nuclear advocate David Littleproud likely to stay on as leader of the Nationals, we will need to stay active and organised.

The Don’t Nuke the Climate initiative has welcomed the clear rejection of nuclear power by Australian voters. You can read the response here.

There is lots of significant detail in this outcome:

  • Nuclear as an option for domestic energy is now dead. Australians have voted for a future that is powered by renewable energy
  • The Coalition’s strategy of unleashing anti-renewables propaganda has failed. Its attempt to undermine offshore wind has instead been met with increased votes for the ALP in key seats like Gilmore.
  • It is important to note that the Coalition is losing seats to the ALP and Climate Independents, not parties to their right
  • Votes for The Greens remained strong
  • Most of the Climate Independents were returned, many with increased margins. Other independents, like Alex Dyson, built their support, putting conservative incumbents closer to losing their seats
  • Far-right parties like ‘Trumpet of Patriots’ polled very poorly
  • Despite efforts by the Coalition to seize outer suburban areas, the fringes generally solidly backed the ALP. As one commentator put it last night, ‘there was no rebellion in the commuter belt’
  • The shift away from the major parties continues. The base of the Coalition is now boomers, and Gen X and millennials are now the largest voting blocks. This will continue to push Australia towards progressive politics
  • The power of the Murdoch press to swing elections is in continued decline – this was on full display last night as Sky After Dark commentators urged the Coalition to go (even further) to the right

We want to acknowledge the extraordinary efforts of the seven regions that opposed the LNP’s plan to force nuclear reactors onto their communities. As FoE campaigner in the Latrobe Valley Wendy Farmer said on the night, ‘now the seven regions can focus on building a future with renewable energy, working for our communities’. Communities around the country have fought hard this election and we’d also like to give a special shoutout to local groups like Good for the Gong in the Illawarra who have been championing the case for offshore wind. These groups have been on the frontlines of a difficult fight, building the community power our movement needs to win big change.

This is a summary from FoE Australia: https://www.foe.org.au/australia_votes_against_division

Nuclear Power Community Meeting in Sturt

There will be a public meeting in the marginal SA electorate of Sturt to support people from Port Augusta opposing the proposal to build a nuclear reactor in their city. Everyone is welcome to come.

Hear speakers from Port Augusta (including Aboriginal people) who oppose a Nuclear Power Plant in their city and our state.

The meeting will be on Wednesday 30 April from 7pm at the Glenunga Hub,
70 Conyngham Street Glenunga

(Directly off Greenhill Road or Glen Osmond Road)

Speakers include:
Clinton (Stano) Dadleh from Don’t Nuke Port Augusta
Dr Jim Green, Friends of the Earth Australia
Dr Kate Wylie, Doctors for the Environment

The event is hosted by Friends of the Earth Adelaide and Don’t Nuke Port Augusta.

Please book your free ticket at the Humanitix link below to help us organise.

https://events.humanitix.com/nuclear-power-community-meeting/tickets

Election related material authorised by Cam Walker, Friends of the Earth, 312 Smith St, Collingwood, VIC, 3066

Response to Osborne Submarine Construction Yard Strategic Assessment

Our recommendations:

1. Correct the factual errors regarding the effects of radiation.

2. Include active commissioning in the assessment.

3. Include the disposal of radioactive waste in the assessment and publish plans for management, storage and disposal of all streams of radioactive waste, including intermediate and high-level waste and spent nuclear fuel.

4. Include a proper analysis of the risks and consequences of incidents and accidents that could lead to a release of radioactive material into the environment.

5. Inform the public about the potential for exposure to radiation and the levels of radiation they could be exposed to.

6. The Commonwealth Government should consult with other levels of government, the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, emergency services and with the general public to develop a response plan for radiological emergencies.

7. Publish the Strategic Assessment Plan before finalizing the Strategic Impact Assessment Report.

Read our full submission:

250314AUKUS SIA – FoEAdelaide

Response to Submarine Construction Yard Environmental Impact Statement

Our submission raised questions about assumptions made about the nuclear submarine agreements:

“The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is premised on the assumption that the proposed AUKUS nuclear submarines are in Australia’s strategic interest (pp. 9-10) and South Australia’s economic interests (pp. 12-13). Both these premises are false.

Many highly qualified defence experts argue that nuclear submarines are not in Australia’s strategic interest. [1]
Along with these experts, and retired senior politicians like Paul Keating, Gareth Evans and Malcolm Turnbull, we believe that Australia will be less safe if it acquires nuclear powered submarines. Although it is the federal government that has made this strategic blunder, the EIS should not lend it any credence (as in section 1.5.4).

AUKUS submarines will also be prejudicial to our economic interest. Some of the abovementioned analysts don’t think Australia will actually ever get the promised nuclear submarines, certainly not in a reasonable time frame. This is a view not restricted to left-leaning people. Conservative commentator Greg Sheridan has criticised AUKUS for this reason.[2]”

 

[1] Hugh White, “From the submarine to the ridiculous”, The Saturday Paper, 18 September 2021 https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/2021/09/18/the-submarine-the-ridiculous/163188720012499#mtr
Major General Michael G Smith AO (Ret’d), ‘How should Australia defend itself in the 21st century? Silencing the drums and dogs of war’, The New Daily, May 26, 2023 https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/2023/05/26/how-should-australia-defend-itself-in-the-21st-century-silencingthe-drums-and-dogs-of-war/
Sam Roggeveen, ‘Spiky questions remain for AUKUS proponents’, Inside Story, 19 March 2024 https://insidestory.org.au/spiky-questions-remain-for-aukus-proponents/

[2] Greg Sheridan, ‘Our nuclear subs fantasy adds up to military net zero’, The Australian, 6 October 2021. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/our-nuclear-subs-fantasy-adds-up-to-military-net-zero/newsstory/cec3b5e94c5bacac405a5eb535b3a628

Read our full submission:

250314AUKUS EIS – FoEAdelaide

 

Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties re “Agreement … for Cooperation related to Naval Nuclear Propulsion”

Philip White wrote a detailed submission, which he summarises:

We strongly believe that the Agreement should not be entered into in the first place. The proposal for Australia to acquire nuclear powered submarines should be rejected on security, safety, nuclear non-proliferation, environmental and economic grounds. Given that both sides of politics have committed themselves to these submarines, it would take some political courage to reverse course. If the government does not have enough political courage to make the right decision now, then it should encourage the US and UK governments to do the arithmetic and quickly come to the conclusion that they can’t build submarines fast enough to supply Australia without degrading their own nuclear propulsion programs. The quicker everyone acknowledges this and exercises their right to terminate the Agreement, the less money will be wasted.”

The full submission can be downloaded:

240826JSCOTSubmission – FoEAdelaide