Will SA politicians accept an AUKUS nuclear dump?

During the 2025 federal election FoE Adelaide ran a successful campaign opposing the Coalition’s plan to build nuclear power plants at 7 sites around Australia, including Port Augusta.

We are now following up with a campaign focusing on the forthcoming SA state election (March 2026). We are conducting a letter-writing campaign targeting politicians in South Australia asking them to declare their position on AUKUS nuclear waste. We have sent letters to the responsible ministers (Premier Peter Malinauskas, Minister for Climate, Environment & Water Lucy Hood, and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Kyam Maher), all other state and federal Labor MPs, and other Labor candidates for the forthcoming state election.

We encourage you to send letters to MINISTERS, SENATORS and to your LOCAL MPs and CANDIDATES. You don’t have to restrict yourself to Labor MPs and candidates. 

Contact details for Labor members and candidates can be found here.

Contact details for Liberal members and candidates can be found here.

PLEASE TELL US ANY RESPONSES YOU RECEIVE. We would like to publish any useful comments from politicians.

Our letters asked politicians to declare their positions on the following questions:

1. Will you oppose or accept an AUKUS high-level nuclear waste dump being imposed on South Australia by the Federal Government?

2. Will you call for full and prompt disclosure from the Federal Government on an AUKUS nuclear waste storage and siting process?

3. Do you respect and support Indigenous Peoples’ right to say “No” to storage and disposal of AUKUS nuclear waste on their country in South Australia, and agree that Australia should uphold the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People?

“Article 29, part 2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that no storage or disposal of hazardous materials shall take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples without their free, prior and informed consent.”

4. Will you oppose the decommissioning of AUKUS nuclear powered submarines and nuclear reactors at Osborne / Port Adelaide, or at Whyalla or elsewhere in SA?

Click here to read the full text of our letter.

Use your own words, or feel free to copy our letter. Let’s make sure our politicians know that this is an issue that matters to South Australian voters.

More background is contained in briefing paper by David Noonan.

Arabana Mound Springs stories v. BHP

Arabana Traditional Owners, elders and rangers, and environmentalist David Noonan got strong ABC media coverage about BHP’s water extraction for its Olympic Dam copper–uranium mine. Long term water extraction has had severe impacts on the unique and fragile Mound Springs of the Great Artesian Basin (GAB).

1. The second of two ABC stories, ‘Call to protect the Springs now’, was broadcast on ABC SA Ch.2 TV News on Monday 24th Nov 2025 and is available on IVIEW. See Intro “Under pressure, how fresh water extraction is taking a toll on an ancient underground reserve” at 30 sec in, and story “Water concerns” at 4 minutes 55 sec in:

https://iview.abc.net.au/video/NU2506S328S00

(ABC IVIEW may ask you to free sign in.)

See also related article on ABC News website, Calls to end water extraction from Great Artesian Basin before culturally significant springs are lost – ABC News, published Monday 24th Nov.

2. The first of two ABC stories with Arabana Elders and Rangers on Mound Springs of GAB was broadcast on ABC SA TV News on Sunday 23rd November 2025. It is also available on IVIEW. Coverage starts about 11 min 25 secs in, and runs 4.5 mins:

https://iview.abc.net.au/show/abc-news-sa/series/0/video/NU2506S327S00

See also related article on ABC News website Water is under pressure in the Great Artesian Basin – ABC News, published Sunday 23rd Nov.

3. You can read a more detailed article by David Noonan published in Friends of the Earth Australia’s national magazine Chain Reaction, #149, April 2025, p.36-37:

The SA government and BHP need to protect the Great Artesian Basin Mound Springs

 

Nuke Submarine ‘community consultation’

Australian Naval Infrastructure (ANI) is conducting a ‘community consultation’ about its plan to lodge a site licence application for the ‘Nuclear-Powered Submarine Construction Yard Project’. An application has to be lodged with the new Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Regulator before it can prepare a site for a Naval Nuclear Propulsion facility.

We wonder why they are in such a hurry to apply for a site licence when the Strategic Impact Assessment (SIA – Commonwealth process) and the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS – State government process) haven’t even been finalised. FoE Adelaide made submissions to both these processes (click to read our SIA submission & our EIS submission) in March 2025, but no public submissions and no follow-up report have been published. We also made a submission on the new nuclear powered submarine Regulations, which came into effect on 1 November 2025 without any response to the public comments received.

Click here (251123FoEAdelaideSubmission) to read our submission to ANI’s site licence ‘community consultation’.

And let us never forget that acquiring nuclear powered submarines is a bad idea in the first place.

AUKUS nuclear waste targets SA

David Noonan via Beyond Nuclear <beyond-nuclear@googlegroups.com> wrote:

see ‘AUKUS nuclear waste targets SA’ a new 2-page Briefer, please distribute and consider getting involved.

with Calls on all SA politicians (Federal & State) and candidates for the SA State Election on 21st March to declare their positions on storage of AUKUS nuclear waste in SA, and a Call for full disclosure on the Federal Gov’s ongoing nuclear waste storage siting review ‘process’.

please consider taking up this initiative in your own way and raising awareness toward the SA Election, so we can have an informed debate on the Calls:

Q: Will you accept or reject Federal imposed storage of AUKUS nuclear waste in SA?

Q: Will you respect and support Indigenous Peoples Human Rights to Say No to Federal siting of AUKUS nuclear waste storage on their country in SA?

Q: Will you rule out untenable ‘decommissioning’ of nuclear subs and nuclear reactors at Osborne Port Adelaide, or else-where in SA?

“The people and environment of South Australia must be protected from Federal imposed storage of AUKUS High-Level nuclear waste”

Brief by David Noonan Independent Environment Campaigner 

https://nuclear.foe.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Noonan-AUKUS-nuclear-wastes-target-SA-Briefer-9-Nov-2025.pdf

FoE Adelaide AGM Saturday Nov 15th, 2pm

Our AGM is at the Minor Works Building Community Centre at 2pm on Saturday, November 15th.
[The Minor Works Building is at 22 Stamford Ct, Adelaide —
there is a wide path leading to the centre between 50 and 52 Sturt Street]

Non-members are welcome.

Agenda

2pm – videos and discussion on AUKUS nuclear submarines
David Noonan and Jim Green will be present for the discussion.
See
 ‘AUKUS nuclear waste targets SA’ a new 2-page Briefer, with Calls on all SA politicians (Federal & State) and candidates for the SA State Election on 21st March to declare their positions on storage of AUKUS nuclear waste in SA, and a Call for full disclosure on the Federal Gov’s ongoing nuclear waste storage siting review ‘process’.“The people and environment of South Australia must be protected from Federal imposed storage of AUKUS High-Level nuclear waste”

Brief by David Noonan Independent Environment Campaigner 9 Nov 2025 here.

3.15pm – AGM – reports from officebearers, election of new Admin & Strategy Collective.
3.45pm close
Zoom – please RSVP for  link
Tea, coffee and snacks provided
We’d love to have some new people join us on the Admin & Strategy Collective.
We meet mainly via zoom, and occasionally at a cafe in the city, at mutually convenient times.
Please come along and help us make quorum.
RSVP and enquiries: Robyn Wood, Secretary adelaide.office@foe.org.au or 0423 219 096